1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Event | 02.20.25, 3:00 PM PST - 4:00 PM PST | CLE Offered

Address

Estancia La Jolla Hotel & Spa
9700 North Torrey Pines Road,
San Diego, CA 92037

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.

For any questions, please contact the organization at service@americanbar.org.

For more information, please visit these areas: Insurance / Reinsurance, Litigation and Trial

Participants

Insights

Event | 12.04.25

ACI 30th Annual Conference on Drug & Medical Device Litigation

Dan Campbell with Speak on the panel "Mastering MDL Case Management: What Proposed Rule 16.1 Really Means for Consolidated Litigation."
Rule 16.1 attempts to guide early case management in MDLs, impacting litigation pace and costs. Permissive language like “should” instead of “must”, could lead to inconsistent applications. This panel will explore the rule’s anticipated impact and implications for procedures.