1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Government Contracts 101

Government Contracts 101

Event | 10.23.19, 4:00 AM EDT - 1:00 PM EDT

Address

The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner
1700 Tysons Blvd, McLean, VA 22102, USA

Join us as we provide an overview of the fundamentals of contracting with the federal government. Topics to discuss include the FAR, key statutes and regulations, bid and proposal process, bid protests, disputes, cybersecurity, changes, claims, key compliance issues, suspension/debarment, and costs.


This full-day course is designed for those attorneys and business personnel that may be new to government contracting and for those that may need a "refresher." There is no fee to attend but the course is for government contractors only, no outside law firms or government personnel.

Continuing Legal Education — We will provide a certificate of attendance and other materials to use in seeking continuing education credits.


Click here to view the seminar agenda. 


For more information, please visit these areas: Government Contracts

Contact

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.