1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Georgetown Law 12th Annual eDiscovery Institute

Georgetown Law 12th Annual eDiscovery Institute

Event | 11.19.15 - 11.20.15, 7:30 AM UTC - 3:00 PM UTC

Address

JW Marriott

The 12th Annual Advanced eDiscovery Institute will provide you with the tools to effectively manage the electronic discovery process, from "Advancing the Tools of the Trade" to learning "What Gen Z Knows that You Don't." Our program will host numerous sessions for you to learn about a range of topics from tech to process and professionalism. You will also be give the opportunity to convene with federal judges and the country's leading eDiscovery practitioners. With an immense variety of topics and speakers, our Advanced eDiscovery Institute will teach you the most advanced skills and essentials to conduct your eDiscovery process.


Jeane Thomas is the Moderator of the topic, "Trending Now: #CrossBorder eDiscovery."

For more information, please visit these areas: Litigation and Trial, E-Discovery and Information Management

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.