“Garden Leaves” and Other Strategies to Protect Trade Secrets When Losing Employees
Event | 03.28.13, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC
Layoffs and terminations continue regardless of whether the economy continues to skid along or moves towards more consistent growth. Employers risk that those individuals they terminate will walk-down-the-street and join a key competitor, where they will divulge trade secrets among other highly confidential information that could be very detrimental if shared with the competition. But, as each day passes, hopefully the more stale the information possessed by the employee becomes. This is the case, for example, where the employee possesses key information regarding strategic planning initiatives.
There may be ways to prevent key employees from walking down the street and sharing an employer’s trade secrets despite the uncertainty surrounding non-compete agreements. This is the case even in states like California, where creative approaches to drafting post-termination restrictive covenants, including, “Garden Leave” provisions, can provide employers with some protections after the departure of key employees.
Please join us for a special webinar that will discuss the viability of “Garden Leave” provisions in employment contracts, as well as other post-termination restrictive covenants. The Crowell & Moring team will discuss the current state of the law in this area as well as strategies employers can employ to minimize the risk of loss of trade secrets and other confidential information when they lose employees.
Presenters include some of the most experienced attorneys in the field, and we hope you can join us.
For more information, please visit these areas: Litigation and Trial, White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement, Trade Secrets, Intellectual Property Litigation, Intellectual Property
Insights
Event | 02.20.25
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.
Event | 12.05.24
Event | 12.05.24
Event | 12.04.24
Inside the Arbitrators’ Chambers: Best Practices of Arbitrators