1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Free Trade in the North Pacific? Implications of a Korea - United States Free Trade Agreement for US - Japan Economic Relations

Free Trade in the North Pacific? Implications of a Korea - United States Free Trade Agreement for US - Japan Economic Relations

Event | 10.18.06, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

Andrew Conrad, senior vice president and counsel at Aflac International, Inc.; Hiroaki Ishii, commercial minister counselor at the Embassy of Japan in Washington, D.C.; Amy Jackson, former director of Japan Affairs at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and director of C & M International, LLP; Jessica Webster, director of the economic section at the Office of Japan Affairs at the U.S. Department of State; Joseph Winder, president of Winder International; and Kent Calder, director of the SAIS Reischauer Center for East Asian Studies, will discuss this topic.

Crowell & Moring International's Amy Jackson will be participating in a panel discussion.

For more information, please visit these areas: Crowell Global Advisors

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.