1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Dispute Avoidance and Resolution 2006

Dispute Avoidance and Resolution 2006

Event | 08.29.06 - 08.31.06, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure:

Key program highlights will include:

  • Case studies: legal framework optimization
  • Legal risk control through due diligence
  • Effective compliance practices inline with business strategy
  • An arbitrator’s perspective
  • Enforcement of awards in China
  • Qualifying and managing disputes over legal outsourcing
  • IP agreement drafting considerations and tips

Crowell & Moring's Kimberley Chen Nobles and Alex de Gramont will be speaking on the topic, Litigation & Arbitration Planning: Maximizing Your Company's Ability To Achieve Its Interests in Dispute Resolution. Ms. Chen Nobles has been asked to co-chair the program along with Andrew Starger of AT&T China.

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.