1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Debt Debate: Implications for Greater Washington Business

Debt Debate: Implications for Greater Washington Business

Event | 07.28.11, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

As the debt ceiling debate continues between the White House and Congress, uncertainty looms for business operations in Greater Washington. Understanding how far-reaching the implications will be for things here is difficult to grasp: a shutdown looms if August 2 comes and goes; credit ratings for state and local governments may be downgraded, causing difficulty in borrowing at a critical cash-flow point in the year; almost every potential deal has drastic reductions planned for the federal workforce, contracting community and beyond. The Board of Trade is convening a special program on Thursday, July 28th, to help business leaders understand and prepare for the implications of the debt-debate.  
 

This timely event will bring together regional thought leaders to address the impact to area firms, State/District and local governments (including discussion of potential rating downgrades, borrowing power, etc.) Topics will address any risks to major projects – such as funding for Rail to Dulles, HOT Lanes and the ICC. Special emphasis will be given to exploring implications for the contracting community, government-funded university research and federal/state/municipal workers.

For more information, please visit these areas: Government Contracts

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.