1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Crowell Café’s Controversies

Crowell Café’s Controversies

Event | 11.26.19, 11:30 AM CST - 2:00 PM CST

Address

Crowell & Moring
Rue Joseph Stevens 7, B-1000 Brussels

For our first edition of Cr♀well Café’s Controversies, we are very excited to welcome the following panel of leadership and inclusion experts:

  • Ann Caluwaerts, Telenet
  • Alexander De Croo, Deputy Prime Minister; Open Vld; author of "De Eeuw van de Vrouw"
  • Monica De Jonghe, VBO-FEB
  • Anne De Wolf, De Wolf Legal
  • Agapi Patsa, Google

Panelists will participate in Cr♀well Café’s Controversies: a panel discussion on diversity and inclusion in a future-proof workplace.


The panelists will be presenting and explaining their view on several controversial statements, including statements on quota for more diverse leadership, the impact of nature and nurture in leadership skills, the causes and solutions for the glass ceiling and pay gap, teamwork across generations, etc.


Looking forward to seeing you at our event.

For more information, please visit these areas: Brussels Practice

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.