1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Credit Default Swaps: Exploring the Controversy

Credit Default Swaps: Exploring the Controversy

Event | 11.20.08, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

Join Crowell & Moring's webinar discussion about the emerging credit default swap conflicts that are being played out in the federal, state and bankruptcy courts throughout the country. We will also explore the various regulatory bodies' involvement in the brewing controversies. Leading experts will participate in the discussion including, sitting U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert E. Grossman; workout specialist John Ray of Avidity Partners, who is also Chairman of Enron Creditors Recovery Corporation; experienced civil litigator William J. McSherry, Jr., a partner at Crowell & Moring; and former Department of Justice attorney and Enron Task Force member Thomas A. Hanusik, also a partner at Crowell & Moring.


Topics will include:


• Applicable Law and Venues
• Judicial Reactions and Counterparty Reactions
• Bankruptcy Issues: Lessons from Lehman Brothers
• Future Litigation and Regulation
• Criminal/Regulatory Investigations

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.