1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Banking Cryptocurrency Companies After Crypto Winter - A New Thaw?

Banking Cryptocurrency Companies After Crypto Winter - A New Thaw?

Event | 06.13.24, 5:30 PM EDT - 7:30 PM EDT

Address

Crowell & Moring
Two Manhattan West,
375 9th Ave
New York, NY

Register Here

Please join us for an insightful panel discussion on the intricate dynamics between banks and cryptocurrency companies, especially in the aftermath of the challenges posed by the so-called Crypto Winter. Our panelists will delve into various pivotal topics, including the challenges faced by both crypto companies and banks and the considerations that drive these partnerships, including crucial aspects of anti-money laundering and sanctions risks.

We are thrilled to be joined by industry experts Ben Melnicki, who serves as Cross River Bank's Product and Regulatory counsel where he is responsible for providing regulatory advice to the Bank’s business units and control functions on all aspects of U.S. banking law, and Andrew Rosenberg, who oversees Ripple's Global Compliance program, including AML, Sanctions, Fraud and Anti-Bribery & Corruption, across Ripple’s corporate structure.

We hope you will stay and join us for drinks and light bites following the conclusion of the panel. 

Please note that this event is closed to the press and will be off the record.

Questions - For questions about this event, please contact Sam Dwyer.

For more information, please visit these areas: Corporate and Transactional, Financial Services, Digital Assets and Payments, Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Economic Sanctions

Participants

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.

View All Insights