1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |ACI 24th Annual Conference on Drug & Medical Device Litigation

ACI 24th Annual Conference on Drug & Medical Device Litigation

Event | 12.09.19 - 12.10.19, 3:30 AM EST - 12:00 PM EST

Address

New York Marriott Marquis
1535 Broadway, New York, NY, 10036

ACI’s Drug and Medical Device Litigation conference is the only event which brings together an exceptional in-house presence on the faculty, the top defense firms representing pharmaceutical and medical device companies, experienced jurists from around the country, the FDA, and the DOJ. Designed for both networking and masters-level strategy sharing, this is the leading forum at which to learn winning life sciences products liability litigation strategies.


Partner Andrew Kaplan will participate in a panel titled, "Combatting Extreme Jury Verdicts: Navigating Extraneous Factors That are Influencing Juror Findings" on Tuesday, December 10th at 3:30 pm.

For more information, please visit these areas: Mass Tort, Product, and Consumer Litigation, Medical Devices

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.