ACC - Navigating the New Regulatory Landscape
Event | 06.26.14, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC
Developments in Consumer Protection, Advertising and Privacy at the Agencies and in the Courts
When dealing with the myriad complexities of regulatory matters in the U.S., California businesses need fast answers, a clear path forward, and guidance based on direct experience. In today’s highly regulated climate, regulatory issues routinely spawn civil litigation, and legal departments face intense public scrutiny along the way. Enforcement is on the uptick, and the outcomes of regulatory challenges can make significant impacts on business activities. In this session, Crowell & Moring attorney Cheryl Falvey, formerly the General Counsel of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, will share her unique perspective and first-hand knowledge of how the agencies work, how they think, and what is percolating within them. She will:
- Explain the jurisdictional reach of the various federal agencies regulating consumer products, food, cosmetics and other products
- Demystify the boundaries corporate counsel must navigate in their compliance responsibilities, reporting obligations, media announcements, and warning campaigns
- Outline the current regulatory and litigation climate affecting the promotion, labeling, distribution, and sale of products, including on the Internet
- Provide an overview of green chemistry regulations Review the FTC actions on the incorporation of technology into products and the requirement to meet their expectations on privacy and security
Crowell & Moring litigator Steve Allison will provide a very brief overview of how regulatory actions can affect class action litigation, particularly in California, including:
- Primary jurisdiction Indemnification
- Class certification/ascertainability
- Class settlement
Please plan to join us for this informative session.
Crowell & Moring is the sponsor.
For more information, please visit these areas: Litigation and Trial, Product Risk Management
Participants
Insights
Event | 02.20.25
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today
Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.
Event | 12.05.24
Event | 12.05.24
Event | 12.04.24
Inside the Arbitrators’ Chambers: Best Practices of Arbitrators