1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |ABA Teleconference: Massachusetts v. EPA: A New Regulatory Climate?

ABA Teleconference: Massachusetts v. EPA: A New Regulatory Climate?

Event | 04.17.07, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

On April 2, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, by a 5-4 vote, that EPA has authority to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles. The Court remanded the case to EPA. This teleconference will discuss the implications of the decision: What will happen at EPA, and when? How will the decision affect other industries? How will pending litigation be affected, and will new lawsuits be spawned? What do lawyers need to tell their clients in preparing for future carbon regulation?

Ann Klee is one of the panelists in this teleconference.

For more information, please visit these areas: Environment and Natural Resources

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.