1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |ABA - National Institute on White Collar Crime

ABA - National Institute on White Collar Crime

Event | 03.04.09 - 03.06.09, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

The American Bar Association 2009 White Collar Crime National Institute will be meeting for the twenty-third consecutive year. Over 1,300 practitioners attended last year’s annual gathering of the national white collar bar. As in the past, we continue to have outstanding panelists who deal with the most timely issues. Each year the Institute brings together judges, federal, state and local prosecutors, law enforcement officials, defense attorneys, corporate in-house counsel, and members of the academic community.

The attendees include experienced litigators, as well as attorneys new to the white collar area. Attendees have consistently given the Institute high ratings for the exceptional quality of the Institute’s publication, its valuable updates on new developments and strategies, as well as the rare opportunity it provides to meet colleagues in this field, renew acquaintances and exchange ideas. The faculty includes some of the leading white collar lawyers in the United States. 2009’s keynote panels will continue to focus on the role of ethics and corporate compliance in today’s business environment. Once again, we expect excellent representation from the corporate sector.

Adrian Mebane is the Co-Chair of the Young Lawyers Reception. Andy Liu is a panelist in the Government Contracting and Mandatory Voluntary Disclosures session. Thomas Hanusik is a panelist in the Securities Enforcement session. Janet Levine is the moderator and Steve Byers is a panelist in the E-Discovery session and John Vandevelde is a panelist in the Healthcare Fraud session.

For more information, please visit these areas: E-Discovery and Information Management, White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.