1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |A new paradigm in Belgian competition law? More protection, less competition?

A new paradigm in Belgian competition law? More protection, less competition?

Event | 10.24.19, 12:00 PM UTC - 2:00 PM UTC

Address

Crowell & Moring
Rue Joseph Stevens 7, B-1000 Brussels

Register

Join us for a walk through the changed B2B landscape! 


On May 24, 2019, two new acts in the field of competition law were published in the Belgian Official Gazette. They will soon enter into force.


Inspired by existing rules in other Member States of the EU, the first Act (April 4, 2019) adds two new branches to Belgian market law: a prohibition of abuse of economic dependence (which can be enforced by the Belgian Competition Authority as well as through private actions) and a prohibition of unfair terms in B2B-contracts. This act also extends the existing rules on unfair B2C commercial practices to the B2B-sphere. The second Act (May 2, 2019) brings a large number of non-fundamental, but yet practical and relevant changes to the competition rules (book IV of the Code of Economic Law).


The new laws affect all sectors of economic life. The prohibition on abuse of economic dependence raises major questions relating to its enforcement. The prohibition of unfair terms in B2B-contracts will significantly affect the possibility of commercial partners to freely negotiate contracts.


The focus of this seminar will be on the major practical consequences of these legislative changes.

For more information, please visit these areas: Brussels Practice, Antitrust and Competition — Brussels Practice, Antitrust and Competition

Participants

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.

View All Insights