1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |401(k) Individual Suits After LaRue v. DeWolff

401(k) Individual Suits After LaRue v. DeWolff

Event | 04.02.08, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

On February 20th, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc. that individual participants in 401(k) plans can sue when their employers or retirement sponsors ignore their investment instructions or otherwise mishandle their investment accounts.


In a separate concurrence, two justices suggested that the remedies available to employees could be limited, making the true impact of the ruling uncertain. Employers' counsel fear the ruling may result in a flood of individual lawsuits against plan sponsors.


In the wake of this ruling, counsel for plan sponsors should take a critical look at how their clients' 401(k) plans are managed and advise them of steps to take to reduce the likelihood of ERISA litigation or minimize liability exposure if they are sued.


Listen and participate from your telephone as our panel of employee benefits attorneys reviews the LaRue decision and its implications and offers best practices for plan sponsors to minimize liability exposure for 401(k) plan administration.


For more information, please visit these areas: Labor and Employment

Participants

Insights

Event | 12.04.25

ACI 30th Annual Conference on Drug & Medical Device Litigation

Dan Campbell with Speak on the panel "Mastering MDL Case Management: What Proposed Rule 16.1 Really Means for Consolidated Litigation."
Rule 16.1 attempts to guide early case management in MDLs, impacting litigation pace and costs. Permissive language like “should” instead of “must”, could lead to inconsistent applications. This panel will explore the rule’s anticipated impact and implications for procedures.