1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |36th Annual Advanced ALI-ABA Course of Study Environmental Law

36th Annual Advanced ALI-ABA Course of Study Environmental Law

Event | 02.09.06 - 02.10.06, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

Comprising almost 18 hours of instruction , the course is widely recognized as the preeminent annual opportunity for environmental lawyers and other professionals to learn from one another and from a faculty of leading practitioners, scholars, and governmental officials. A significant percentage of the nation's environmental bar has attended this course, which, through the years, has served more and more practitioners with considerable experience in the practice.

While designed principally for the environmental law practitioner, the course also continues to serve attorneys seeking to enter the field, in part through a series of optional introductory lectures on the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Superfund, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. (These introductory lectures are presented on the Wednesday evening before the first full day of the course.) Through the years, however, the course has evolved as an advanced review and update of the particularly significant recent developments in each subject area. This trend has enabled the course to serve the substantial and ever-increasing percentage of registrants who are experienced practitioners.

Time is reserved throughout the program to address written questions from the registrants. 

Partner Steve Quarles participated in a panel discussion, Public Lands and the Endangered Species Act as part of this two day event.

For more information, please visit these areas: Environment and Natural Resources

Insights

Event | 12.04.25

ACI 30th Annual Conference on Drug & Medical Device Litigation

Dan Campbell with Speak on the panel "Mastering MDL Case Management: What Proposed Rule 16.1 Really Means for Consolidated Litigation."
Rule 16.1 attempts to guide early case management in MDLs, impacting litigation pace and costs. Permissive language like “should” instead of “must”, could lead to inconsistent applications. This panel will explore the rule’s anticipated impact and implications for procedures.