1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |2024 NYU Tax Controversy Forum

2024 NYU Tax Controversy Forum

Event | 06.27.24, 3:20 PM EDT | CLE Offered

Address

The Westin New York at Times Square
270 W 43rd St,
New York, NY 10036

Register Here

The annual NYU School of Professional Studies Tax Controversy Forum features interactive presentations delivered by expert practitioners who cover a broad range of issues regarding tax audits and tax litigation at all levels.

Content encompasses the timeline of controversy work—from planning for the examination of a return and audit and administrative appeals processes, to litigation techniques and strategies. Panelists representing both taxpayers and the government share views on the latest issues and perspectives on tax controversies. Attendees learn practical solutions and valuable insights from leading authorities from across the profession.

This year’s NYU Tax Controversy Forum will feature updates on what the IRS is doing to enhance compliance through communication and enforcement. Panels will highlight the new IRS focus on intra-agency collaboration, new initiatives with respect to penalties and fraud referrals, and IRS’ handling of tax collection challenges.

Crowell & Moring’s tax partner, Carina C. Federico, will be attending the 2024 NYU Tax Controversy Forum in New York, NY from June 27-28. Carina will moderate the panel “IRA Clean Energy Credits and Anticipated Enforcement” on Thursday, June 27 at 4:30 pm EST.

Crowell & Moring’s tax partner, Starling Marshall will speak on the panel, "Your Client Earns More Than $400,000 - Effectively Managing IRS Examinations of the High Income/High Net Worth Taxpayer" on Thursday, June 27 at 3:20 p.m.

For more information, please visit these areas: Tax, Tax Controversy

Participants

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.

View All Insights