You Wanna Sue Your Employer for Overtime? The Labor Department Has an App for That!
Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.17.11
On May 9, 2011, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a free smartphone application designed to help employees independently track hours worked. In what is apparently a regulatory "first," the app is being co-marketed with Apple and available on iTunes The app allows users to enter hours worked either manually or automatically using a timer, and to both view and e-mail reports of time worked. The app also includes a prominent "contact us" button, with links that allow users to easily call or send an e-mail to the DOL's Wage & Hour Division. The app only permits recordation of basic overtime calculations, and does not handle items such as tips, commissions, bonuses, deductions, holiday pay, or shift differentials. Nothing in the app requires correlation of information recorded against the employer's timekeeping system.
In addition to providing valuable information for a Wage Hour division investigation, the app gives employees (and plaintiffs' lawyers) the ability to create contemporaneous records of time worked. In cases where employer time records are alleged to be incomplete, such records can give plaintiffs a significant boost in proving damages, particularly in collective and class actions. As lower courts continue to struggle over the proper interpretation of the Supreme Court's 1946 decision in Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Property, the accuracy of employee recollections of hours worked has become an increasingly important issue in litigating these cases. For employers, this initiative reinforces the importance of making sure accurate timekeeping records are maintained for all non-exempt employees.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.20.26
SCOTUS Holds IEEPA Tariffs Unlawful
On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a pivotal ruling in Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, negating the President’s ability to impose tariffs under IEEPA. The case stemmed from President Trump’s invocation of IEEPA to levy tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, China, and other countries, citing national emergencies. Challengers argued—and the Court agreed—that IEEPA does not delegate tariff authority to the President. The power to tariff is vested in Congress by the Constitution and cannot be delegated to the President absent express authority from Congress.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 02.20.26
Section 5949 Proposed Rule Puts the FAR Council's Chips on the Table
Client Alert | 5 min read | 02.20.26
Trump Administration Pursues MFN Pricing for Prescription Drugs
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.19.26
Proposed NY Legislation May Mean Potential Criminal Charges for Unlicensed Crypto Firms

