Who Says There’s No Free Parking in New York?
Client Alert | 3 min read | 12.12.18
On December 7, 2018, Governor Cuomo signed into law, effective January 1, 2018, an amendment to New York Tax Law that negated, for New York State tax purposes, the effect of a 2017 change to the Internal Revenue Code relating to unrelated business income tax (UBIT) that disadvantaged many 501(c)(3) organizations. As part of the federal legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), certain expenditures related to transportation benefits for employees, including transit and parking, were made nondeductible for federal income tax purposes. Most notably, certain kinds of free parking for employees were made nondeductible. Because section 501(c)(3) organizations do not ordinarily pay income tax, in order to apply the tax cost consistently to tax-exempt organizations as well as taxable businesses, the TCJA made these amounts subject to the UBIT for tax-exempts. See Internal Revenue Code section 512(a)(7). This change in the law came as a surprise to the nonprofit community, which has been advocating repeal of this tax increase. Section 501(c)(3) organizations objected both to the tax cost of this change to the law as well as the complexity of computing these amounts and complying with the new law. From the point of view of the nonprofit sector, this expansion of UBIT has diverted funding and put nonprofits at risk.
On December 7, 2018, the Internal Revenue Service published Notice 2018-99, which provided some long-anticipated guidance on how to calculate the nondeductible transportation benefits, including free parking. The initial reviews have been that the Notice is helpful on some fronts. However, the general principle that the federal version of UBIT applies to some kinds of free parking that tax-exempt organizations provide to their employees remains the law. In other words, the federal UBIT law remains in place and the fact based calculations in the interim guidance are quite complex.
Subsequently, on December 10, 2018, the House proposed an amendment to the Senate amendment of H.R. 88 that would repeal Section 512(a)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code retroactive to the date of enactment. However, in order to become law, the bill must be approved by the House and Senate and signed by the President.
New York State has its own version of UBIT. New York taxes unrelated business income at a 9 percent rate. Because New York Tax Law generally incorporates federal income tax provisions, if the New York legislature had taken no action, the transportation benefits made nondeductible by the TCJA would have been subject to a 9 percent tax (resulting in a total tax of 30 percent taking into account the 21 percent federal UBIT rate). The New York legislature, however, chose to override the TCJA so that the New York version of UBIT does not apply to these disallowed transportation benefits.
Still, all tax-exempt organizations that provide disallowed transportation benefits should review the Notice to determine what the 2017 Federal tax increase means for the 2018 tax year and what actions, if any, can be taken to minimize that tax.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 12.13.24
New FTC Telemarketing Sales Rule Amendments
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) recently announced that it approved final amendments to its Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”), broadening the rule’s coverage to inbound calls for technical support (“Tech Support”) services. For example, if a Tech Support company presents a pop-up alert (such as one that claims consumers’ computers or other devices are infected with malware or other problems) or uses a direct mail solicitation to induce consumers to call about Tech Support services, that conduct would violate the amended TSR.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 12.10.24
Fast Lane to the Future: FCC Greenlights Smarter, Safer Cars
Client Alert | 6 min read | 12.09.24
Eleven States Sue Asset Managers Alleging ESG Conspiracy to Restrict Coal Production
Client Alert | 3 min read | 12.09.24
New York Department of Labor Issues Guidance Regarding Paid Prenatal Leave, Taking Effect January 1