USPTO Issues Preliminary Alice Corp. Instructions and Invites Comments
Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.02.14
On June 25, 2014, the United States Patent and Trademark (USPTO) issued its Preliminary Alice Corp. Instructions on the application of the United States Supreme Court decision in Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, et al., No 13-298. The Preliminary Alice Corp. Instructions provide guidance to USPTO examiners when determining subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101 of claims involving abstract ideas. The USPTO provided the following guidance:
- The USPTO will expand the two-part test set forth in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 56 U.S. ___ (2012) to abstract ideas. Prior to Alice, the USPTO only applied the Mayo two-part test to claims involving laws of nature. See MPEP 2106.01.
- The USPTO will apply the Mayo two-part test across all categories of claims (e.g., product and process claims).
- Finally, the USPTO set forth the Mayo two-part test in detail, including several comments and examples.
The USPTO invited comments on the Preliminary Alice Corp. Instructions. Comments must be submitted by July 31, 2014, and instructions to provide comments is listed on the USPTO website.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.04.26
EU Pay Transparency Directive: The Transposition Deadline is Looming — What Now?
Three years have passed since the EU Pay Transparency Directive ("PTD") came into existence, and it now appears highly likely that very few EU Member States will have fully transposed its provisions into national law by the 7 June 2026 deadline. For employers operating across the EU, this creates a deeply uncomfortable question: what are your obligations right now?
Client Alert | 6 min read | 06.03.26
Executive Order Creates Voluntary Regulatory Regime of Frontier AI Models
Client Alert | 8 min read | 06.03.26
ICC Releases New 2026 Arbitration Rules: Key Changes Effective 1 June 2026
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.03.26
Important EU Court Judgment Clarifies Rules on Interest Due in Cartel Damages Cases


