1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |U.S. Treasury Department Announces It Will Not Enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and BOI Reporting Rule Against U.S. Citizens and Domestic Reporting Companies

U.S. Treasury Department Announces It Will Not Enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and BOI Reporting Rule Against U.S. Citizens and Domestic Reporting Companies

What You Need to Know

  • Key takeaway #1

    The U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) announced on March 2, 2025, that it will not pursue any enforcement against “U.S. citizens” or domestic reporting companies for violations of the current Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rule (BOI Rule) or any future rule.

  • Key takeaway #2

    Treasury stated that it intends to issue a proposed rulemaking that will narrow the scope of the BOI Rule to “foreign reporting companies” only and set new reporting deadlines.

  • Key takeaway #3

    Per Treasury, if the forthcoming proposed rule were to take effect, U.S. citizens and “domestic reporting companies” would not be required to submit BOI reports.

Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.04.25

On February 28, 2025, we reported that the Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) paused enforcement actions for entities required to report under the CTA’s BOI Rule (Reporting Companies) for failure to file or update beneficial ownership information (BOI) reports by a previously-announced March 21, 2025, deadline. FinCEN had explained that the pause would last until it issued an interim final rule further updating reporting deadlines and providing new guidance around the BOI Rule’s requirements.

On March 2, 2025, Treasury announced in a press release (Release) that “not only will it not enforce any penalties or fines associated with the beneficial ownership information reporting rule under the existing regulatory deadlines, but it will further not enforce any penalties or fines against U.S. citizens or domestic reporting companies or their beneficial owners after the forthcoming rule changes take effect either.” The Release explained that Treasury will issue a proposed rulemaking that will narrow the scope of the BOI Rule to “foreign reporting companies,” which is currently defined in the BOI Rule as entities (including corporations and limited liability companies) formed under the law of a foreign country that have registered to do business in the United States by the filing of a document with a secretary of state or any similar office. 

With respect to the forthcoming rulemaking, the CTA gives Treasury discretion to exempt certain types or classes of entities from the CTA’s reporting requirements under certain conditions, namely, if Treasury determines that requiring BOI information from a class of entities “would not serve the public interest” and “would not be highly useful in national security, intelligence, and law enforcement agency efforts to detect, prevent, or prosecute money laundering, the financing of terrorism, proliferation finance, serious tax fraud, or other crimes.” 

Implications

Based on its March 2, 2025 announcement, it seems possible that Treasury may be considering the use of this discretionary authority to considerably narrow the scope of BOI reporting requirements. It also remains to be seen whether Treasury’s forthcoming rule will impact or render moot the various pending court challenges to the CTA and current BOI Rule, or affect the pending HR 736, a bill that would—if enacted into law—extend the reporting deadline for entities that are a “small business concern,” as defined under 15 U.S.C. 632, to January 1, 2026. 

Given the repeatedly-changing regulatory landscape around the CTA and BOI Rule, Reporting Companies—both foreign and domestic—should continue to remain alert for further developments. Crowell & Moring will continue to monitor and provide updates on the status of the CTA as appropriate. Please do not hesitate to reach out to your Crowell & Moring contacts or the authors of this alert with questions.

 

 

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26

DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability

On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”...