1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Unduly Restrictive Specification Requires Redo

Unduly Restrictive Specification Requires Redo

Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 03.24.15

In Smith and Nephew Inc. (Jan. 2, 2015), publicly released this week, GAO sustained a pre-award solicitation protest alleging that the VA had unduly restricted competition with an unnecessary specification requirement. GAO concluded that the "minimum fluid absorption rate" for medical bandages demanded by the VA was not based on any demonstrable agency need, was predicated on one repudiated test study by a single contractor, and could not be met by any commercially available product in the marketplace.

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.26.25

Court Vacates CMS’s 2023 Final Rule on RADV Audits

On September 25, 2025, the Northern District of Texas granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in Humana v. Becerra, vacating CMS’s 2023 Final Rule regarding risk adjustment data validation (RADV) audits. In the litigation, Humana challenged CMS’s decision in the Final Rule to not continue applying a Fee-for-Service (FFS) adjuster to its RADV audit methodology....