Two Bites Allowed If In Different Spots On The Apple
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 01.06.10
In the latest decision in SUFI Network Servs., Inc. (Dec. 14, 2009), the ASBCA ruled that a motion for reconsideration of its earlier decision on reconsideration was in order, to the extent it challenged new rulings and computations in the reconsideration decision. Applying that rationale, the board found further error in some of its enhanced damages findings on reconsideration and granted additional relief to the contractor, while rejecting other claims as repetitious.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.15.26
Kansas Federal Court Applies “Selective Enforcement” Theory to Reject DTSA Claim
A Kansas federal court held that inconsistent enforcement of trade secret rights can defeat a claim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). In Edelman Financial Engines, LLC v. Mariner Wealth Advisors LLC, No. 2:23-cv-02515-HLT (D. Kan. June 5, 2026), the court applied a selective enforcement theory, holding that when a company does not consistently pursue legal remedies against similarly situated former employees, that inconsistency can be affirmative evidence that it failed to protect its trade secrets. While the selective enforcement theory has appeared in academic hypothetical discussions, the decision appears to be one of the clearest judicial applications of a “selective enforcement” theory in a trade secret case.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
