To Disclose or Not To Disclose: Federal Government & Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities
Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.16.17
On November 15, 2017, the White House Cybersecurity Coordinator, Rob Joyce, announced a formative cybersecurity policy entitled “Vulnerabilities Equities Policy and Process for the United States Government.”
According to the policy, the primary focus is to “prioritize the public's interest in cybersecurity and to protect core Internet infrastructure, information systems, critical infrastructure systems, and the U.S. economy through the disclosure of vulnerabilities discovered by the United States Government (USG).” The Vulnerabilities Equities Process (VEP) balances dissemination of vulnerability information (e.g., zero day exploits) to the vendor/supplier in the expectation that it will be patched with temporarily restricting the knowledge of the vulnerability to the USG, and potentially other partners, so that it can be used for national security and law enforcement purposes, such as intelligence collection, military operations, and/or counterintelligence. In striking this balance, the policy aims to increase transparency regarding the process for the public and businesses, and also signals that the US will join with several countries that have announced formal policies in this area regarding management of vulnerabilities. Interestingly, this policy expands the management of vulnerabilities to include a broad array of national security and intelligence agencies.
This policy supersedes the Commercial and Government Information Technology and Industrial Control Product or System Vulnerabilities Equities Policy and Process, dated February 16, 2010.
This policy applies to all USG components and personnel and contractors and includes Government off-the-shelf (GOTS), Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS), or other commercial information systems (to include open-source software), Industrial Control Systems (ICS) or products, and associated systems such as Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) and Distributed Control Systems (DCS).
Businesses and the public will likely be interested in the annual public reporting that is promised, which may include statistics about how many vulnerabilities go through the process and even potentially how long they are withheld from disclosure.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 06.24.26
On June 17, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ( National Security Division (NSD) announced that it had issued a declination for Robert Bosch GmbH (Bosch) relating to potential violations of the Export Control Reform Act, 50 U.S.C. § 4819 (ECRA). Specifically, the DOJ declined to criminally prosecute Bosch’s violations of the Export Administration Regulations’ (EAR) Foreign Direct Product Rule (FDPR), which apparently resulted from two Bosch subsidiaries’ export of products and software manufactured with equipment that was the direct product of U.S. software or technology to Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. and its “Entity List” affiliates, including Huawei Tech. Investment Co., Ltd., Hong Kong (collectively, Huawei). The same day, the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced a parallel civil administrative settlement with Bosch.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.24.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.23.26
EPA Hands Over AI Data Center Regulation to States and Communities to Develop Best Practices
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.22.26

