These Are a Few of Our Favorite IoT: NIST Finalizes Internet of Things Cyber Guidance
Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.02.19
NIST has finalized Internet of Things (IoT) risk management guidance, which derived from a draft publication. The guidance informs government agencies how to understand and manage IoT risks throughout device lifecycles. Industry can anticipate government focus on three high-level goals:
- Device security;
- Data security; and
- Individual privacy.
The publication highlights three differences between managing risks for IoT devices and conventional information technology devices:
- IoT devices interact with the physical world differently than conventional devices;
- IoT devices cannot be accessed and monitored the same as conventional devices; and
- The availability and effectiveness of cybersecurity and privacy capabilities are different for IoT devices than conventional devices.
While not mandatory, the guidance provides useful considerations for IoT cybersecurity and privacy risk management.
Contacts
Partner, Crowell Global Advisors Senior Director
- Washington, D.C.
- D | +1.202.624.2698
- Washington, D.C. (CGA)
- D | +1 202.624.2500
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.26.25
From ‘Second’ to ‘First:’ Federal Circuit Tackles Obvious Claim Errors
Patent claims must be clear and definite, as they set the boundaries of the patentee’s rights. Occasionally, however, claim language contains errors, such as typographical mistakes or incorrect numbering. Courts possess very limited authority to correct such errors. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has emphasized that judicial correction is appropriate only in rare circumstances, where (1) the error is evident from the face of the patent, and (2) the proposed correction is the sole reasonable interpretation in view of the claim language, specification, and prosecution history. See Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 407 F.3d 1297, 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) and Novo Indus., L.P. v. Micro Molds Corp., 350 F.3d 1348, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
Client Alert | 5 min read | 11.26.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.25.25
Brussels Court Clarifies the EU’s SPC Manufacturing Waiver Regulation Rules
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.24.25
