1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |The Latest in AT/IP: FTC Rules Against Rambus -- Lack of Disclosure Leads to Finding of Violation of the Sherman Act

The Latest in AT/IP: FTC Rules Against Rambus -- Lack of Disclosure Leads to Finding of Violation of the Sherman Act

Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.02.06

The Federal Trade Commission has determined that Rambus, Inc. unlawfully monopolized the markets for four computer memory technologies that have been incorporated into industry standards for dynamic random access memory ("DRAM") chips. While participating in the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council (JEDEC), a standard-setting organization, Rambus failed to disclose to the organization or its members that it was actively working to develop, and possessed, a patent and several pending patent applications that involved specific technologies ultimately adopted in the standards. The FTC found that Rambus' omission constituted deceptive conduct sufficient to violate Section 2 of the Sherman Act.

In rendering its opinion, the FTC explained that members of standard-setting organizations have a good faith duty to disclose intellectual property rights, particularly where membership in an organization expressly requires such disclosure. The FTC held that where disclosure is required, non-disclosure of a patent followed by adoption of that patent into a standard and royalty demands by the non-disclosing patent owner was considered a "material omission" constituting a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act in addition to Section 2 of the Sherman Act. Appeals are expected.

For more information: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/08/rambus.htm

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 12.13.24

New FTC Telemarketing Sales Rule Amendments

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”)  recently announced that it approved final amendments to its Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”), broadening the rule’s coverage to inbound calls for technical support (“Tech Support”) services. For example, if a Tech Support company presents a pop-up alert (such as one that claims consumers’ computers or other devices are infected with malware or other problems) or uses a direct mail solicitation to induce consumers to call about Tech Support services, that conduct would violate the amended TSR. ...