The House Goes Long On Drones
Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.20.22
Last week, the House passed the Drone Infrastructure Inspection Grant Act, which establishes programs within the Department of Transportation (DOT) to support the use of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) when inspecting, repairing, or constructing a variety of types of infrastructure, including roads, electric grids, water, and other critical infrastructure.
Specifically, the legislation authorizes DOT to award up to $100 million over two years in grants to state, tribal and local governments to support their purchase and use of sUAS to increase efficiency, reduce costs, improve worker safety, and reduce carbon emissions when carrying out infrastructure inspections, repairs, and construction. In addition to the customary flowdown requirements that accompany grant funding, the infrastructure inspection grants will include mandatory country of origin provisions, requiring grant recipients to use U.S.-manufactured sUAS made by companies not subject to Chinese influence or control.
The legislation also authorizes a separate $100 million pool of funding for DOT to use for grants to educational institutions to support student training and education in the use of drones and related technologies.
The bill, which passed the House by a 308-110 vote, now proceeds to the Senate. A companion bill was introduced in the Senate on August 8 and has been referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation for consideration. Both bills have significant support from industry leaders and local government groups.
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.29.25
President Trump Issues Executive Order Deprioritizing Disparate Impact Theory of Discrimination
On April 23, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order, Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy, declaring it the policy of the United States “to eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible to avoid violating the constitution, Federal civil rights laws, and basic American ideals.” The order reasons that “disparate impact liability all but requires individuals and businesses to consider race and engage in racial balancing to avoid potentially crippling legal liability.”
Client Alert | 6 min read | 04.28.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.28.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.25.25