The Dockworkers’ Strike and Safeguarding Your Rights
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.03.24
At midnight on October 1, 2024, the International Longshoremen’s Association launched a labor strike that effectively shut down all ports from Maine to Texas after being unable to reach agreement on terms for a new labor contract with the United States Maritime Alliance. This strike may impact virtually all industries that rely on maritime shipping, either directly or indirectly.
Government contractors should be cognizant of their rights since shipping delays resulting from the strike could affect their performance. If a contract incorporates FAR 52.249-14, Excusable Delays, or one of the FAR Default clauses, such as FAR 52.249-8, Default (Fixed-Price Supply and Service), then delays that are attributable to the dockworkers’ strike should be excusable, and contract performance times extended. However, if the delay is attributable to a subcontractor whose performance is impacted by the dockworkers’ strike, then a prime contractor may need to consider the possibility of procuring supplies from an alternative supplier. Contractors should use their best efforts to timely notify their respective contracting officers of any performance impacts and request additional time to perform, as well as document any directions they receive from the contracting officer.
The FAR’s Excusable Delay clause and the Default clauses do not address monetary relief for excusable delays. However, certain circumstances may change the calculus, such as where the government does not grant extensions when appropriate, or when certain warranties made by the government were breached as a result of the strike. Thus, it is important to provide notice to the government in the event of delays caused by the strike, and it is worthwhile in any notice of impact to the government to reserve the right to seek an equitable adjustment for cost and schedule impacts, as applicable.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.29.26
On 8 October 2026, Crowell & Moring, King's College London, and the Competition Law Center at George Washington University co-hosted the 7th EU Competition Law Conference at De Warande in Brussels. Mark Meador, Commissioner at the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), delivered the opening keynote address, followed by four panels bringing together practitioners, regulators, academics, and in-house counsel to discuss the latest developments in EU, UK, and US competition law enforcement. Among other things, the panels examined algorithmic pricing; the European Commission's (Commission) new guidelines on exclusionary abuses under Article 102 TFEU (Article 102 Guidelines); the impact of dominant positions in merger reviews; and lessons from the enforcement of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the UK’s Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.29.26
What University Licensors Should Learn From TexasLDPC v. Broadcom
Client Alert | 2 min read | 10.28.26
Debriefing to Dead Briefing: How to Avoid Dismissal by Identifying “Required” Debriefings
Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.27.26


