Termination Clause Trumps Cost-Sharing
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 01.23.06
The Federal Circuit in Jacobs Eng'g Group, Inc. v. U.S. (Jan. 19, 2006) had before it the interesting scenario of the government terminating a contract with an 80/20 cost share and the contractor insisting that it should get "all" its costs under the termination for convenience clause, not just 80% per the cost share. The court agreed, because the cost share had not been specifically incorporated in the termination clause and the termination had deprived the contractor of his compensating benefit for taking the cost share in the first place, patent rights in the finished work.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.01.25
D.C. Circuit Rejects Copyrightability of Artwork Created Autonomously by AI
In a unanimous opinion issued by the D.C. Circuit on March 18, 2025, the Court of Appeals affirmed denial of Dr. Stephen Thaler’s application to register a copyright protection for a work created by his generative artificial intelligence system, holding that the Copyright Act requires human authorship.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.01.25
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.01.25
For Better or MORSE: Another Settlement Under DOJ’s Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.01.25
Hatch-Waxman PTE for Reissue Patents Should Be Calculated From the Original Patent’s Issue Date
