Termination Clause Trumps Cost-Sharing
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 01.23.06
The Federal Circuit in Jacobs Eng'g Group, Inc. v. U.S. (Jan. 19, 2006) had before it the interesting scenario of the government terminating a contract with an 80/20 cost share and the contractor insisting that it should get "all" its costs under the termination for convenience clause, not just 80% per the cost share. The court agreed, because the cost share had not been specifically incorporated in the termination clause and the termination had deprived the contractor of his compensating benefit for taking the cost share in the first place, patent rights in the finished work.
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.21.26
Securities Law for Entrepreneurs
Do you want your startup to expand and become a major player in your industry? If so, you will most likely need to seek capital from outside investors to help you build infrastructure and fulfill orders.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 09.22.26
UK Government Proposes Corporate Reporting Reform and Removal of ESG Reporting Rules
Client Alert | 5 min read | 09.21.26
Congressional Letter Puts Spotlight on Unenforceable Secrecy Demands in Federal Subpoenas
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.21.26
In a First, District Court Dismisses FCA Cybersecurity Complaint for Lack of Materiality
