State of New York Files Suit Against Federal Agencies Seeking Environmental Review of Natural Gas Development in the Delaware River Basin
Client Alert | 1 min read | 06.02.11
On May 31, 2011, the State of New York sued various federal agencies and agency officials in the Eastern District of New York alleging that the agencies and officials violated the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") by allowing regulations proposed by the Delaware River Basin Commission ("DRBC") that would authorize natural gas development, including hydraulic fracturing, in the Delaware River Basin to move forward without first studying their environmental effects and preparing an environmental impact statement. The DRBC is a regional body comprised of state and federal officials that regulates and manages the water resources of the Delaware River Basin. New York asserts that the development of the DRBC regulations is a "federal action" that triggers NEPA review because the defendant federal agencies - including the Corps of Engineers, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the Department of the Interior, and the Environmental Protection Agency - "play a significant role" in the development of the regulations and "have authority to approve the DRBC Regulations."
According to the Complaint, the proposed DRBC regulations would lead to the development of 15,000 to 18,000 natural gas wells within the Delaware River Basin. Focusing on potential environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing, New York alleges that the proposed natural gas development would endanger New York's unfiltered drinking water supply and the use of the Upper Delaware River for recreational and conservation purposes, and also cause air pollution and contribute to climate change.
The Complaint notes that DRBC proposed the regulations over the objections of former New York governor David Paterson. Hydraulic fracturing has been a contentious issue in New York. In December 2010, Governor Paterson signed an executive order banning high volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing in New York through July 1, 2011. This year, several bills have been introduced in the New York State Assembly to restrict or regulate hydraulic fracturing in the state.
For a copy of the complaint, click here.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
