State Court Patent Ownership Judgment Not Subject To Collateral Review
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.26.07
In MyMail, Ltd. v. America Online, Inc., (No. 06-1147, -1172; February 20, 2007), the Federal Circuit affirms the district court's denial of a collateral attack on the ownership of the patent due to fraud. MyMail obtained ownership of the patent by assignment. The assignee obtained the patent application through a state court foreclosure action on a promissory note secured by the application. America Online asserts that the promissory note is fraudulent and this issue is subject to de novo review by federal courts. Distinguishing fraud relating to procurement of a patent, which bears on the enforceability, the Federal Circuit holds that fraud relating to ownership does not affect enforceability and is a state law issue. Since there is an enforceable state court judgment of ownership, that can be challenged only in limited circumstances, fraud in ownership is not subject to de novo review by federal courts.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 08.27.26
FCC Clarifies Covered List for Power Inverters and Advanced Robotic Devices
On July 28, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) updated its Covered List — established through the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act — to include foreign-produced connected power inverters and advanced robotic devices, following an executive branch national security determination that they “pose unacceptable risks to the national security of the United States or the safety and security of United States persons.” Equipment on the Covered List is ineligible for FCC equipment authorization, effectively prohibiting the import, sale, or marketing of those products without an exception or approval.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.26.26
D.C. Circuit Upholds Designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA Hazardous Substances
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.26.26
Client Alert | 6 min read | 08.26.26
The Risky Fifth: A Long Hot Summer in Congressional Jurisprudence
