State Court Patent Ownership Judgment Not Subject To Collateral Review
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.26.07
In MyMail, Ltd. v. America Online, Inc., (No. 06-1147, -1172; February 20, 2007), the Federal Circuit affirms the district court's denial of a collateral attack on the ownership of the patent due to fraud. MyMail obtained ownership of the patent by assignment. The assignee obtained the patent application through a state court foreclosure action on a promissory note secured by the application. America Online asserts that the promissory note is fraudulent and this issue is subject to de novo review by federal courts. Distinguishing fraud relating to procurement of a patent, which bears on the enforceability, the Federal Circuit holds that fraud relating to ownership does not affect enforceability and is a state law issue. Since there is an enforceable state court judgment of ownership, that can be challenged only in limited circumstances, fraud in ownership is not subject to de novo review by federal courts.
Insights
Client Alert | 13 min read | 10.30.25
Federal and State Regulators Target AI Chatbots and Intimate Imagery
In the first few years following the public launch of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in the autumn of 2022, litigation related to AI focused primarily on claims of copyright infringement. Suits revolved around allegations that the data on which AI models train, and/or the output they produce, infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. (While some of these cases have settled or reached preliminary judgments, many remain ongoing.)
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.30.25
Is Course Hero Heading to Summer School After Summary Judgment Loss?
Client Alert | 6 min read | 10.29.25
Enhancing UK cyber security resilience and leadership engagement
Client Alert | 9 min read | 10.28.25
Key Takeaways from a Consequential Month of Russia-Related Sanctions
