Standardizing Federal PII Breach Response: OMB Updates Guidance for Agencies, Contractors, and Grant Recipients
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.11.17
On January 3, 2017, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued M-17-12, which updates and supersedes 2006 and 2007 OMB memoranda on preparing for and responding to breaches of personally identifiable information (PII) by imposing minimum standards on agencies for incident response programs, training and awareness, reporting, and documentation, coupled with requiring use of a flexible framework to assess and mitigate the risk of harm to individuals potentially affected by a PII breach. While making clear that a PII breach does not necessarily indicate an absence of adequate safeguards, the updated guidance also requires agencies to impose specific requirements, such as encryption, training, and incident-response obligations, on all contractors and subcontractors (at any tier); identifies PII-related requirements for federal grant recipients; and directs the FAR Council to “promptly… create appropriate contract clauses and regulatory coverage.”
Contacts
Partner, Crowell Global Advisors Senior Director
- Washington, D.C.
- D | +1.202.624.2698
- Washington, D.C. (CGA)
- D | +1 202.624.2500
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
