Senator Markey Introduces the SPY Car Act to Regulate Automotive Cybersecurity
Client Alert | 4 min read | 08.27.15
On July 14, Senators Edward J. Markey (D-Mass) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn) introduced the Security and Privacy in Your Car Act of 2015, or "SPY Car Act." The bill, which would amend both the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (49 U.S.C. § 30101, et seq.) and the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. § 41 et seq.), has two purposes: (1) to create more secure vehicles, and (2) to better inform consumers about vehicle cybersecurity and the use of driving data.
The SPY Car Act seeks to achieve these goals by imposing both cybersecurity and labeling requirements on automotive manufacturers and by limiting the use of personal driving data. Specifically, if the bill were to pass in its current form, it would:
- Require Federal Cybersecurity Standards for Vehicles: The bill establishes three categories of cybersecurity standards for vehicles—anti-hacking, data security, and threat detection.
- Anti-hacking: anti-hacking measures must be in place for all "entry points1 to electronic systems." Further, manufacturers must incorporate "isolation measures" to separate "critical software systems," which affect the driver's control of vehicle movement, from non-critical software systems. These anti-hacking measures must also be evaluated for vulnerabilities, including through penetration testing, and adjusted and updated accordingly.
- Data security: all driving data collected by electronic systems must be "reasonably secured" against unauthorized access.
- Threat detection: any vehicle with an "entry point" must be able to "immediately detect, report, and stop attempts to intercept driving data or control the vehicle."
- Establish Uniform Cybersecurity Labels for Vehicles: The SPY Car Act would add a "cyber dashboard" to the mandatory fuel economy label to inform consumers about the extent to which the vehicle provides cybersecurity and privacy protection. This dashboard must be "easy-to-understand" and "standardized."
- Limit the Use of Personal Driving Data: The Act would amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to give the FTC authority to enforce privacy standards for motor vehicles and limit the use of personal driving data. All vehicles would have to provide "clear conspicuous notice, in clear and plain language" about the collection, transmission, retention and use of driving data. In addition, owners and lessees would have to be given the opportunity to terminate collection and retention of that data, and termination should not result in the loss of navigation or other features "to the extent technically possible." Finally, information collected by a motor vehicle could not be used for advertising and marketing purposes absent the consumer's express consent.
The SPY Car Act proposes that these requirements apply to all motor vehicles manufactured for sale in the United States two years after implementing regulations are enacted. Final regulations, per the SPY Car Act, would be in place three years after it is enacted. Thus, these requirements could take effect in approximately five years. In addition, the regulations would be reviewed and updated every three years.
The SPY Car Act is one of several recent signals that Congress's interest in the Internet of Things is heightening. One of the bill's sponsors, Senator Markey, has been a particularly vocal advocate of increased regulation in this space. In February of this year, he released a report titled, "Tracking and Hacking: Security & Privacy Gaps that Put American Drivers at Risk." Also in February, Senator Markey proposed federal automotive cybersecurity standards at the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation hearing examining the Internet of Things. Senator Deb Fischer (R-NE) and Representative Leonard Lance (R-NJ) have likewise introduced and passed resolutions in the Senate and House seeking to impose a national strategy for the Internet of Things to promote economic growth and consumer empowerment.
Manufacturers, marketers, and others should follow Congressional activity on these issues closely, as this is likely just the beginning of increasing federal interest and action in this space.
1 The Act defines "entry points" to include means by which "driving data" may be accessed or control signals may be sent or received. "Driving data" includes information about a vehicle's status (such as its location or speed) or its owners/operators/passengers.
Other Articles in This Month's Edition:
- Third Circuit Upholds the FTC's Authority to Regulate 'Unfair' Data Security Practices
- FDA Loses Battle to Limit Truthful, Non-Misleading Off-Label Promotion of Approved Drugs
- A Hashtag Away from a Warning Letter? Kim Kardashian's Instagram Post Triggers FDA Warning Letter that Sends a Strong Message to Drug Makers
- Got Lead? Significant Changes to Proposition 65's Lead MADL May Be on the Horizon
- An EU Logo for Safer Online Shopping for Medicines
- Advertisers in the Ring – A Roundup of This Month's Competitor Advertising Challenges: Unique Features and Outstanding Reviews – What Counts?
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 12.10.24
Fast Lane to the Future: FCC Greenlights Smarter, Safer Cars
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has recently issued a second report and order to modernize vehicle communication technology by transitioning to Cellular-Vehicle-to-Everything (C-V2X) systems within the 5.9 GHz spectrum band. This initiative is part of a broader effort to advance Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) in the U.S., enhancing road safety and traffic efficiency. While we previously reported on the frustrations with the long time it took to finalize rules concerning C-V2X technology, this almost-final version of the rule has stirred excitement in the industry as companies can start to accelerate development, now that they know the rules they must comply with.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 12.09.24
Eleven States Sue Asset Managers Alleging ESG Conspiracy to Restrict Coal Production
Client Alert | 3 min read | 12.09.24
New York Department of Labor Issues Guidance Regarding Paid Prenatal Leave, Taking Effect January 1
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.06.24