Section 809 Panel Weighs in on Ways to Modernize the Board of Contract Appeals
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.01.19
In the Section 809 Panel’s third and final volume of its report, the panel urged Congress to require contractors and contracting officers to use electronic case management system (ECMS) for the Boards of Contract Appeals and to permit the boards to collect user fees to pay for the upkeep of the system. The panel used the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) as a case study citing to voluminous records and an uptick in cases since 2009 as a reason to require the use of an ECMS.
The panel also urged Congress to increase the thresholds for accelerated and expedited appeals before the Board of Contract Appeals. The panel noted that the thresholds established in the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 were amended once in 1994 and have not been amended since. The panel recommends the following increased thresholds: (1) $250,000 threshold for accelerated procedures for all businesses (previously $100,000); and (2) $150,000 threshold for expedited procedures (previously $50,000) or $250,000 for small business concerns (previously $150,000). The time period for the boards to issue decisions under the accelerated and expedited procedures would remain unchanged. The panel recommended requiring threshold review every five years to mirror the requirement for other acquisition-related thresholds.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.28.26
Earlier this month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew a February 2024 Biden administration proposed rule, “Definition of Hazardous Waste Applicable to Corrective Action for Releases From Solid Waste Management Units,” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).[1] The withdrawn proposal would have revised RCRA corrective action regulations to expressly apply the broader statutory definition of “hazardous waste,” rather than only the narrower regulatory definition. Now, EPA is maintaining the status quo for corrective action under RCRA. However, EPA’s withdrawal of its proposed RCRA hazardous waste definition makes no mention of its corresponding proposal from 2024 to list nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as RCRA hazardous constituents.[2] This disjointed withdrawal, while providing some certainty for regulated entities, does not resolve how EPA plans to address PFAS under the RCRA program.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 05.28.26
Texas Targets Big Tech With Wave of Suits and Investigations, Part of Nationwide Trend
Client Alert | 7 min read | 05.27.26
Colorado Hits Reset on AI Regulation: SB 26-189 Repeals and Reenacts the Colorado AI Act
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.27.26
Don’t Get Left in the Doghouse: The Federal Circuit’s Global K9 Case and the Duty to Intervene


