1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Section 809 Panel Weighs in on Ways to Modernize the Board of Contract Appeals

Section 809 Panel Weighs in on Ways to Modernize the Board of Contract Appeals

Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.01.19

In the Section 809 Panel’s third and final volume of its report, the panel urged Congress to require contractors and contracting officers to use electronic case management system (ECMS) for the Boards of Contract Appeals and to permit the boards to collect user fees to pay for the upkeep of the system. The panel used the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) as a case study citing to voluminous records and an uptick in cases since 2009 as a reason to require the use of an ECMS.

The panel also urged Congress to increase the thresholds for accelerated and expedited appeals before the Board of Contract Appeals. The panel noted that the thresholds established in the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 were amended once in 1994 and have not been amended since. The panel recommends the following increased thresholds: (1) $250,000 threshold for accelerated procedures for all businesses (previously $100,000); and (2) $150,000 threshold for expedited procedures (previously $50,000) or $250,000 for small business concerns (previously $150,000). The time period for the boards to issue decisions under the accelerated and expedited procedures would remain unchanged. The panel recommended requiring threshold review every five years to mirror the requirement for other acquisition-related thresholds. 

Insights

Client Alert | 8 min read | 09.08.26

Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa [2026] UKSC 21: Good Faith in the Boardroom

The UK Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the appeal of Mr Francesco Costa, former chairman of Spring Media Investments Limited, in the first Supreme Court judgment to consider the scope of the duty under section 172(1) of the Companies Act 2006. The foundational position is that good faith requires honest conduct as well as honest thinking. A director's genuine belief that they are acting in the company's best interests will not excuse covert or disloyal conduct in pursuit of that belief. ...