Section 809 Panel Recommends Five Changes to Bid Protests in DoD Procurements
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.30.19
As previously reported, the Section 809 Panel released the third and final volume of its report on January 15, 2019. Volume 3 contains several recommendations that, if implemented, would materially impact the bid protest process. These recommendations include:
- Rec. 35 – Institute new procedures for DoD’s acquisition of “readily available” goods and services, replacing current procedures for the acquisition of commercial items. The proposal would eliminate all pre-award protests, as well as post-award protests at GAO and COFC, for procurements of “readily available” items valued at less than $15 million. Agency level challenges would be limited to whether DoD had conducted adequate market research to confirm “readily available” status.
- Rec. 66 – Establish a “purpose statement” for protests.
- Rec. 67 – Eliminate follow-on protests at COFC after a GAO protest, and impose a 100-day deadline for the issuance of a decision on protests filed at COFC.
- Rec. 68 – Limit COFC and GAO protest jurisdiction to procurements greater than $75,000.
- Rec. 69 – For all required debriefings, provide a redacted Source Selection Decision Document and technical evaluation for the offeror requesting the debriefing.
The full report can be found here.
We will be providing further analysis of these and other issues related to the panel’s final volume on our blog shortly. Stay tuned for updates.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.03.26
On July 20, 2026, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill signed the Forbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Act into law, making New Jersey the fourth state to regulate algorithmic rent-setting practices. Three days later, on July 23, 2026, Governor Sherrill signed the Fair Price Protection Act, which targets “surveillance pricing”—the practice of using or collecting personal data about a user and using an algorithm or artificial intelligence to charge different consumers different prices for the same products. Together, these laws represent a significant expansion of New Jersey's consumer protection framework in the algorithmic pricing context.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 08.03.26
The Pipe, Not the Posts: How Section 230’s Protections Extend to Generative AI Platforms
Client Alert | 4 min read | 07.31.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.31.26
