Second domestic sales threshold for German merger control in force today
Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.25.09
Today, 25 March 2009, an amendment to the German Act against Restraints of Competition entered into force (the day after its publication in Germany’s Official Journal). The amendment introduces a second domestic sales threshold for German merger control.
The new threshold requires that at least two parties to a transaction must each have individual sales in Germany of € 5 million (approx. US$ 6.77 million) or more. In addition, as before, the parties to the transaction must have combined worldwide sales of more than € 500 million and at least one of them must have sales in Germany of more than € 25 million.
The amendment applies to all concentrations, i.e. mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures, that have not been completed prior to its entry into force. Thus, mergers for which an agreement has already been signed but have not yet been completed need not be notified if they do not trigger the new threshold. The Bundeskartellamt will terminate all ongoing proceedings in relation to concentrations that have already been notified but do not trigger the new threshold. The Bundeskartellamt will clarify its position on its fees in these proceedings in the coming days. The fees for terminated proceedings are likely to be reduced.
Click for the official text of the amendment in German [PDF].
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.15.26
GAO Indicates Reasonable Conflict of Interest Investigation Must Include Inquiry of Involved Firm
The U.S. Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) recent decision in Viderity Inc.—Costs, B-424422.5, Sept. 1, 2026, offers useful insight into what constitutes a legally sufficient conflict of interest investigation. The decision arose in an unusual procedural posture: Viderity initially protested, alleging that an agency evaluator had a personal conflict of interest. After the agency took corrective action, Viderity filed a cost entitlement claim requesting that GAO direct the agency to reimburse Viderity’s protest costs. In evaluating that claim, GAO assessed whether Viderity’s underlying protest ground was “clearly meritorious.”
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.15.26
Client Alert | 7 min read | 09.14.26
AI in Life Sciences: Ten Legal Considerations and Risks of AI Use in Drug Discovery and Development
Client Alert | 6 min read | 09.14.26
Mental Health Parity Bulletin Restates Best Practices for Evaluating Compliance
