SEC Ramps Up Dodd-Frank Enforcement by Scrutinizing Confidentiality and Financial Award Restrictions
Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.04.15
The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) reported late last week that the SEC recently sent letters to several publicly-traded companies, demanding they turn over five years' worth of non-disclosure agreements, employment agreements, severance and release agreements, and other related documents. The SEC is apparently seeking documents that arguably restrict an employee's or former employee's ability to disclose information to the SEC as part of an investigation into alleged violations of the securities laws. The requests allegedly also seek copies of any agreements or other documents that attempt to restrict the ability of employees or former employees to participate in any recovery or settlement they would otherwise be entitled to under the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as lists of employees who have been terminated.
The SEC's letters follow on the 2014 edition of its annual report on its whistleblower program in which the agency stated that it was "working to identify employee confidentiality, severance, and other kinds of agreements that may interfere with an employee's ability to report potential wrongdoing to the SEC."
It is unclear what the SEC intends to do with this information. However, the SEC may take a page out of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) playbook. The EEOC has sued several companies in recent years claiming, among other things, that their severance and release agreements improperly prohibit employees from participating in an EEOC investigation or filing an EEOC charge. To date, the EEOC has been largely unsuccessful in this litigation, including a highly publicized case against CVS that was dismissed last October. The EEOC is appealing this decision.
Despite the EEOC's lack of success to date, publicly-traded companies should closely monitor the SEC's initiative The SEC takes the position that employees cannot waive a financial recovery associated with a Dodd Frank investigation. Companies that have not received one of the SEC's letters should review documentation that might be the subject of a similar SEC inquiry. Companies may wish to consider modifying relevant documents, including severance, release, and non-disclosure agreements, to exempt any prohibition against reporting potential wrongdoing to government agencies and to remove any waivers of the right to participate in the whistleblower award provisions of Dodd-Frank.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development


