1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |SEC Disclosure Requirements for State Sponsors of Terrorism

SEC Disclosure Requirements for State Sponsors of Terrorism

Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.04.07

In an effort to provide investors with greater transparency as to public issuers’ disclosures concerning their activities with terrorist-sponsoring countries, the SEC, in June 2007, released a web tool listing "Companies' Activities in Countries Known to Sponsor Terrorism." However, in response to the receipt of numerous complaints concerning the web tool, the SEC removed the list and announced its plan to re-launch the "reference tool" after it addressed the voiced concerns.


The SEC has just issued a Concept Release "soliciting comment about whether it should develop mechanisms to facilitate greater access to companies' disclosures concerning their business activities in or with countries designated as State Sponsors of Terrorism." Specifically, the release seeks public comment on whether it is appropriate to provide easier access to such information, whether the SEC should pursue one of the alternative means to accomplish easier access (e.g., improving the web tool or providing companies with the means to utilize data tagging of relevant information), and any other issues relating to access improvements and the benefits and costs of providing improved access to companies' disclosures. At this time, the Concept Release does not include a list of companies that have made disclosures regarding business activities with State Sponsors of Terrorism (as identified by the U.S. Department of State). The Concept Release may be viewed here http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/2007/33-8860.pdf. The deadline for submitting a comment is January 22, 2008.


The SEC’s enhanced focus on public issuers’ disclosures concerning business activities with State Sponsors of Terrorism raises questions as to how companies should, and do, disclose such activities in public filings. Through Crowell & Moring’s broad SEC-reporting and trade sanctions expertise, we can aid public companies in dealing with the potential new reporting regime imposed by the SEC.


Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26

DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability

On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”...