Saudi Arabia's New Fast-Track Foreign Investment License Application Procedure for Qualifying Applicants
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.17.14
The Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority (SAGIA) is tasked with licensing most foreign capital investments in businesses in Saudi Arabia. In an effort to address ever lengthening license processing times, SAGIA announced in June 2014 that it would be implementing a fast-track license application procedure (the Fast-Track Procedure) for qualified license applicants. After some initial difficulties during its roll-out, the Fast Track Procedure seems now to be providing qualifying applicants with a welcome alternative to SAGIA's often lengthy standard license application procedure.
Under the Fast-Track Procedure, the following types of foreign companies would typically be eligible to submit an abbreviated foreign investment license application that can result in a foreign investment license being issued in as little as five business days:
- Foreign companies with branches or subsidiaries in more than one jurisdiction.
- Foreign companies that are publicly listed on their home country's stock exchange or on an international stock exchange.
- Foreign companies that manufacture products that are classified and approved by independent agencies and employ certified process technology.
- Foreign companies that own registered trademarks, patents, or copyrights.
- Foreign companies that are establishing a regional office in Saudi Arabia.
- Foreign construction companies that are classified as Class A in their home countries.
- Foreign companies that have assets worth more than SAR 50 million (about US$ 13,333,333), that have more than 2,000 employees, and that have completed at least one project with a value of at least SAR 500 million (about US$ 133,333,333).
- Foreign companies contracting with the Saudi government or a Saudi government-owned entity or entering into a joint venture with a Saudi company listed on the Saudi Arabian Stock Exchange.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
