Saudi Arabia Changes Weekend to Friday/Saturday from 29 June 2013
Client Alert | 1 min read | 06.24.13
On June 23, 2013, H.M. King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Al Saud issued Royal Order No. O/185 changing the Saudi Arabian weekend from the current Thursday - Friday to Friday -Saturday.
This change brings the Kingdom's working week in line with that of the other member states of the Cooperation Council of the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC).
The change applies as follows:
1.) Effective Saturday June 29, 2013, the new Friday / Saturday weekend will apply to all Saudi Arabian Ministries, the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency and all financial institutions, as well as the Capital Markets Authority and Saudi Stock Exchange (Tadawul);
2.) Effective for the 2013-14 Academic Year, the new Friday / Saturday weekend will apply to all academic institutions including schools and universities.
The Saudi Press Agency said, "The decision was taken due to the crucial importance to achieve the largest homogeneity of weekly working days between agencies, governmental departments, national institutions, and their counterparts at the regional and international levels, and also due to the obvious interests and significant gains for the Kingdom, particularly in the economic aspects. It was also taken for putting an end to the negative effects and lost economic opportunities consistently associated with variation based on some working days between those agencies, institutions and national bodies and their international and regional counterparts."
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.26.25
From ‘Second’ to ‘First:’ Federal Circuit Tackles Obvious Claim Errors
Patent claims must be clear and definite, as they set the boundaries of the patentee’s rights. Occasionally, however, claim language contains errors, such as typographical mistakes or incorrect numbering. Courts possess very limited authority to correct such errors. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has emphasized that judicial correction is appropriate only in rare circumstances, where (1) the error is evident from the face of the patent, and (2) the proposed correction is the sole reasonable interpretation in view of the claim language, specification, and prosecution history. See Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 407 F.3d 1297, 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) and Novo Indus., L.P. v. Micro Molds Corp., 350 F.3d 1348, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
Client Alert | 5 min read | 11.26.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.25.25
Brussels Court Clarifies the EU’s SPC Manufacturing Waiver Regulation Rules
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.24.25
