1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |RETURN TO SENDER: China Provides New Tax and Duty Relief for Goods Returned to China for COVID-19 Reasons

RETURN TO SENDER: China Provides New Tax and Duty Relief for Goods Returned to China for COVID-19 Reasons

Client Alert | 2 min read | 11.12.20

Chinese companies, including Chinese subsidiaries of multinational companies, are seeing returns of previously exported goods for many COVID-19 related reasons, including the suspension of contractual obligations under force majeure provisions. China is now helping affected companies with new tax and duty relief. China Customs announced on November 2, 2020, that the State Council has approved tax rebates for goods returned due to COVID-19. For goods that were exported from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, the exporters will not be required to pay import duties, import value-added tax (“Import VAT”), and consumption tax on goods that are returned to China within one year of export (“Qualified Returned Goods”). Export duties paid on the goods will also be refunded to affected exporters.

The announcement clarifies the procedures and requirements for the new tax rebate policy, as follows:

  1. For companies that have previously received export tax rebates (unrelated to COVID) for Qualified Returned Goods, they will need to account for and pay any applicable refunded/exempt Import VAT and consumption tax to the appropriate tax authorities.
  2. Beginning on November 2, 2020, when declaring imports of Qualified Returned Goods and applying for the import tax exemption, companies will need to obtain certification from the appropriate tax authorities confirming they have remitted payment of the tax for Qualified Returned Goods and have not received any (non-COVID) tax rebates (or they have paid refunded tax to the appropriate tax authorities as stated above in 1.).
  3. For companies that have paid import duties, import VAT, and consumption tax for Qualified Returned Goods between January 1, 2020 and November 2, 2020, China Customs will only issue the tax rebates upon a company’s application – the process is not automatic. For those companies that have not yet declared deductions of Import VAT and consumption tax before submitting such an application, they will need to obtain certifications from the competent tax authorities to confirm that they have paid but have not deducted Import VAT and consumption tax for Qualified Returned Goods. For companies that have declared a deduction of Import VAT and consumption tax, they will only need to submit an application for a refund of collected import duties. The deadline for companies to complete such tax rebate procedures is June 30, 2021.
  4. For China Customs to process tax rebates to companies for Qualified Returned Goods, companies must submit a written statement to China Customs that the subject goods are being returned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. China Customs will proceed based on the contents of that statement. The type of proof needed to support the statement will depend on each company’s unique circumstances and will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

This new tax incentive program could provide some relief for many Chinese companies as well as subsidiaries of multinational companies operating in China that have been adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights