Presolicitation Statements Not Dispositive Of Whether Mod Is Beyond Scope
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 12.28.05
An agency's presolicitation statement that it did not initially intend a contract to include certain work did not bar the agency from later adding that work, according to the Court of Federal Claims in HDM Corp. v. United States (Dec. 14, 2005). Whether a contract was amended beyond its scope depends upon the breadth of the stated objectives of the solicitation, whether bidders were told that work could be added, and the nature of the added work, so early agency statements are not dispositive, the court held in this case successfully litigated by Crowell & Moring.
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.13.25
FTC and NAD Enforcement Priorities & ANA 2025
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs laid out their enforcement priorities during the 2025 ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference, at which Crowell & Moring attorneys spoke on and attended various panels.
Client Alert | 12 min read | 11.13.25
Highlighting Key Takeaways from the Pentagon Acquisition Transformation Strategy
Client Alert | 4 min read | 11.13.25
The Password is “Louvre” – Lessons for Everyone from the Louvre’s Jewel Heist
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.12.25
EPA Proposes Important Revisions to its PFAS Reporting Regulations
