Presolicitation Statements Not Dispositive Of Whether Mod Is Beyond Scope
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 12.28.05
An agency's presolicitation statement that it did not initially intend a contract to include certain work did not bar the agency from later adding that work, according to the Court of Federal Claims in HDM Corp. v. United States (Dec. 14, 2005). Whether a contract was amended beyond its scope depends upon the breadth of the stated objectives of the solicitation, whether bidders were told that work could be added, and the nature of the added work, so early agency statements are not dispositive, the court held in this case successfully litigated by Crowell & Moring.
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.21.26
Securities Law for Entrepreneurs
Do you want your startup to expand and become a major player in your industry? If so, you will most likely need to seek capital from outside investors to help you build infrastructure and fulfill orders.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 09.22.26
ORI's Guidance on AI Misconduct: Disclose, Verify, and Preserve, or Face Consequences
Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.22.26
SBA Extends Deadline for Comments on Historic Overhaul of Size Standards
Client Alert | 5 min read | 09.22.26
UK Government Proposes Corporate Reporting Reform and Removal of ESG Reporting Rules
