President Issues Executive Order Addressing Use of Foreign Labor in Federal Contracting and Hiring
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.05.20
On August 3, 2020, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order framed as “Aligning Federal Contracting and Hiring Practices With the Interests of American Workers.” The Order declares the “policy of the executive branch to create opportunities for United States workers to compete for jobs, including jobs created through Federal contracts,” and directs federal agencies to engage in two distinct reviews to assess how current practices align with that policy.
First, the Order directs the head of each federal contracting agency to review the extent to which “contractors” and “subcontractors” – undefined in the Order – utilize temporary foreign labor for contracts performed in the United States, as well as whether services previously performed in the United States are being outsourced for performance in foreign countries. Agencies are further directed to assess any effect the use of such foreign labor hiring and/or offshoring practices has on opportunities for U.S. workers, the eligibility of affected workers for Trade Adjustment Assistance, and national security interests. Finally, each agency must review its own employment policies to ensure compliance with policies requiring federal hiring of U.S. persons. Within 120 days of the Order, Agencies are required to submit a report to the Office of Management and Budget summarizing the results of this review and recommending corrective actions if necessary, timeframes for implementation of such corrective actions, as well as any Presidential actions that may be appropriate.
Second, the Order also directs the Secretaries of Labor and Homeland Security to take action, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to protect U.S. workers from adverse effects caused by employment of H-1B visa holders, including by requiring employers and “secondary employers” to file certifications required by the Immigration and Nationalization Act (INA) regarding the impact of hiring an H-1B visa holder. The administration has indicated that its goal is to restrict scenarios where a contractor outsources services to H-1B workers that would have otherwise been performed by US employees of the contractor; the intent would be for the outsourcing contractor, as the “secondary employer” of the workers performing the work, to also certify pursuant to the INA that the hiring of that employee has not impacted US citizen employees. This would be in in addition to the certification provided by the worker’s actual employer. It is unclear whether extending the certification requirement to “secondary employers” would address this identified issue.
This Executive Order follows a series of “Buy American and Hire American” orders issued over the past years, and reflects the current administration’s consistent emphasis on domestic sourcing of supplies and services. The administration has indicated that this Executive Order is a continuation of other efforts undertaken during the COVID-19 pandemic to limit immigration and protect American workers.
Like the previous actions, the present Executive Order provides little guidance regarding how agencies should conduct the contemplated reviews, omitting both the types of data agencies should rely upon and what authorities contracting agencies should rely upon to collect additional data from federal contractors and subcontractors. Accordingly, the potential impact on operations and customer relationships for federal contractors and subcontractors remains to be seen. Crowell & Moring intends to monitor agency implementation of this Order and continue to keep our clients updated regarding developments that may impact their business.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.03.26
Important EU Court Judgment Clarifies Rules on Interest Due in Cartel Damages Cases
In a judgment that will have direct and immediate consequences, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has clarified that for all competition damages actions brought after 26 December 2014, interest runs from the date on which the harm occurred. The ruling addressed two important questions: (1) whether national provisions implementing Article 3(2) of the EU Damages Directive — which requires interest to run from the date harm occurred —apply to cases in which the harm preceded the adoption of those provisions; and (2) how the date of harm should be determined in cartel cases involving the purchase of goods at inflated prices.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.02.26
SBA OHA Confirms That the Submission Date for a Proposal with Pricing Controls Size Determination
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.01.26
California Court Upholds Insurer’s Duty to Defend After Covered Claim Is Dismissed
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.29.26
California Assembly Passes AB 1776, Sending Major Antitrust Bill to the Senate





