Posting of Workers – EU Court of Justice Recalls that EU Law Prevails on Member States Regulations Aiming to Combat Social Fraud
Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.23.18
If an employer from one European Union (EU) Member State temporarily posts one of its employees to another EU Member State, the A1 (former E101) certificate confirms that the worker remains subject to the social security scheme of the home country.
Belgian legislation provides that, where the social security authorities or courts establish abuse related to the determination of the correct social security scheme, the Belgian social security scheme will apply to the concerned employee (or self-employed person) if this Belgian scheme would have applied in accordance with the law.
The EU Court of Justice has now ruled that these provisions are in violation with EU law. Indeed, the EU Regulation 987/2009 obliges Member States to follow a specific dialogue and reconciliation procedure in case of doubt about the validity of a document, the supporting evidence, or the accuracy of the facts on which the particulars contained therein are based. If no agreement can be reached in the context of reconciliation, the matter is brought before an Administrative Commission of the EU.
Belgium argued that the prohibition of abuse of rights as general principles of law allows Member States to adopt national provisions that deviate from secondary EU legislation, but this argument failed.
This EU Court decision is not only relevant for Belgium. It should be seen as a clear warning to all EU Member States that national initiatives and regulations aiming to protect their labor market against social fraud need to be aligned with and not contradict EU Regulation 987/2009, and more particularly the dialogue and reconciliation procedure as provided in this Regulation.
Our Brussels Labor & Employment practice is available to advise and assist companies regarding all aspects of international employment and posting of workers.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25


