'Patent Troll' Legislation Stalls, at Least for Now
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.22.14
Nearly six months after the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Innovation Act (H.R. 3309), and three months after President Obama called on the U.S. Senate to "finish the job," Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) is taking the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act off the agenda for the Senate Judiciary Committee.
In removing the Senate bill targeting so-called "patent troll litigation," Sen. Leahy cited lack of sufficient support behind a comprehensive deal, blaming "competing companies on both sides of this issue" that "refused to come to agreement." Before taking the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act completely off the agenda, Sen. Leahy had delayed consideration of the bill numerous times in order to drum up bipartisan support. Sen. Leahy also repeated his earlier concerns that "the House-passed bill went beyond the scope of addressing patent trolls, and would have severe unintended consequences on legitimate patent holders who employ thousands of Americans." Sen. Leahy offered a chance that the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act would pass later this year, but only if "the stakeholders are able to reach a more targeted agreement that focuses on the problem of patent trolls."
With the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act out of the picture, at least for now, Congress is likely to turn its attention to other bills previously introduced in the House and Senate directed toward demand letters. Demand letters are thought to be one of the ways that at least some non-practicing entities (derisively called "patent trolls") most often abuse the patent litigation system. One of those bills, introduced by Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Consumer Protection Chairwoman Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), would create a registry of demand letters that law firms send to accused infringers on behalf of their non-practicing entity clients. In the House, Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) introduced draft legislation just this week that seeks to require patent infringement demand letters to include certain information to help recipient companies investigate the allegations. Hearings on that draft legislation are to be held today.
The Senate has approximately two months in session remaining until the August break and legislation focused on patent trolls during that time now seems very unlikely.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 08.03.26
The Pipe, Not the Posts: How Section 230’s Protections Extend to Generative AI Platforms
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (“Section 230”) protects online platforms from liability for user-generated speech. Based on the premise that platforms generally do not create original content but instead curate their users’ own speech, Section 230’s protections have historically applied to a platform’s algorithmically assembled, selected or sequenced content; algorithms or features that amplified or directed user generated speech to particular users were generally protected. Indeed, the old rule of thumb was the more a platform used algorithms or automation, the more likely user generated speech remained user generated speech. GenAI has the potential to change that calculus. A platform that ingests user generated content and publishes a transformed output, can blur Section 230’s line between publication and creation. The central question is whether Section 230 protects GenAI, which analyzes, but does not alter, user-created content to produce an outcome, and its corresponding outputs.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 07.31.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.31.26
Client Alert | 5 min read | 07.28.26
Data Centers in the Crosshairs: The Plaintiffs' Bar Has Begun Filing New Claims Using Old Tricks

