Patent Application Process Must Be Compliant with U.S. Export Controls
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.25.08
Commerce Reinforces the Need for Export Compliance in Patent Transactions. The Department of Commerce – through the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) – is reaching out to patent applicants and practitioners in several ways to ensure compliance with U.S. export control obligations relevant in the patent context.
Since late 2007, BIS has required users of the USPTO's EFS-Web to certify that their use of this system does not "violate or circumvent" the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), which BIS administers. More recently, the USPTO extended the certification requirement to include users of the Private PAIR system. The certification is intended to ensure that foreign nationals, whether in the United States or another country, are not given unauthorized access to technology that is controlled under the EAR. The certification may be new, but the EAR has long governed the release of controlled technology to foreign nationals.
This issue came to light when the USPTO realized that providing electronic access to the PAIR system could result in an export regardless of whether the applicant was in compliance with the EAR. Requiring certification makes the responsibility to comply more conspicuous in the patent application process.
Exports of controlled technology in patent transactions have gained importance of late as U.S. companies are increasingly outsourcing various functions – including patent-related activities – to offshore service providers. The USPTO recently issued a notice in the Federal Register addressing this issue, in which it reminded applicants of the EAR's controls and clarified the scope of what may be exported pursuant to a USPTO foreign filing license. Specifically, foreign filing licenses only permit the export of the exact scope of technology that has been included as part of a U.S. patent application (or a petition for a foreign filing license), and only for purposes related to the preparation, filing or possible filing, or prosecution of a foreign patent application. Exports of technology for other purposes, including preparation or filing of U.S. patent applications, as well as releases of technology to foreign nationals via databases and other electronic systems located in the United States, licensing of any of the technology to third parties, and internal corporate collaboration or development, must comply with the EAR. Thus, U.S. companies employing foreign nationals, as well as multi-national corporations, should ensure that protections are in place to comply with U.S. export controls throughout the entire patent preparation and prosecution process.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.25.26
Twin Executive Orders Seek to Spur Quantum Leap in Technology and Cybersecurity
On June 22, 2026, President Trump signed two executive orders, “Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks” (Quantum Security EO) and “Ushering in the Next Frontier of Quantum Innovation” (Quantum Innovation EO), marking the most significant federal action on quantum technology since the Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act of 2022, which directed agencies to harden their information systems against quantum-enabled hacking. The orders seek to speed the development of quantum computers, which are advanced processors that can calculate multiple possibilities simultaneously and thus solve problems exponentially faster than traditional computers. At the same time, the orders look to protect against the danger that quantum technology can “break” traditional encryption by easily decoding it. Of particular note for government contractors, the Quantum Security EO directs agencies to update federal acquisition regulations to require contractors by 2031 to adopt information processing standards that resist quantum-enabled codebreaking.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 06.24.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.24.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.23.26
EPA Hands Over AI Data Center Regulation to States and Communities to Develop Best Practices
