1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |OSHA Increases Scrutiny of COVID-19 Record-Keeping

OSHA Increases Scrutiny of COVID-19 Record-Keeping

Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.26.20

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued interim guidance for enforcing the recording of occupational illnesses requirements, specifically for cases of coronavirus (COVID-19). This guidance rescinds OSHA’s earlier guidance providing for enforcement discretion on COVID-19 complaints arising outside of healthcare or emergency response employers. As of May 26, 2020, and until further notice, OSHA will be enforcing the recordkeeping requirements for employee COVID-19 illnesses for all employers.

COVID-19 is a potentially recordable illness, and, per this new guidance, “employers should be taking action to determine whether employee COVID-19 illnesses are work-related and thus recordable.” Noting that cases of COVID-19 have been found in nearly all parts of the country, and not limited to workers in healthcare, emergency response, or correctional institutions, OSHA’s new guidance makes it clear that employers are responsible for OSHA Form 300 recordkeeping requirements for COVID-19 employee cases, if:

  • The case is a confirmed case of COVID-19, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC);
  • The case is work-related as defined by 29 CFR § 1904.5; and
  • The case involves one or more of the general recording criteria set forth in 29 CFR § 1904.7.

OSHA states that it will continue to exercise some enforcement discretion to assess employers’ efforts in making work-related COVID-19 determinations, including considerations such as reasonableness of the employer’s investigation, evidence available to the employer, and evidence that a COVID-19 illness was contracted at work. The guidance highlights that “it is important as a matter of worker health and safety, as well as public health, for an employer to examine COVID-19 cases among workers and respond appropriately to protect workers, regardless of whether a case is ultimately determined to be work-related.”

Because the determination of whether exposure is work-related boils down to the totality of the circumstances, which is inherently prone to interpretation and enforcement difficulties, employers should work with their trained occupational health and safety professionals to develop and document appropriate protocols for making that determination from the outset and then train the relevant employees on implementing those protocols.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights