Only Significant OCIs Require Mitigation
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 08.18.10
On August 5, 2010, the Federal Circuit in PAI Corp. v. U.S. affirmed the lower court's determination that contracting officers have an obligation to mitigate "significant" OCIs, but that the FAR does not require "mitigation of other types of conflicts, such as apparent or potential non-significant conflicts." The Federal Circuit also held that contracting officers have broad discretion to determine whether an OCI is "significant" and that FAR 9.504(a) does not require that contracting officers document their initial identification and evaluation of potential conflicts.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 05.12.26
EU Pharma Package: Advertising Compromise Proposal
In our ninth alert in this EU Pharma Package Series, we discussed the proposals of the Commission, Council, and Parliament with respect to advertising of medicinal products.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.12.26
NYDFS Ramps Up Health Care Cybersecurity Enforcement With $2.25 Million Settlement
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.12.26
The International Claims Commission for Ukraine (ICCU): What Claimants Need to Know
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.12.26
