OFCCP Issues Request For Information on EO Prohibiting Race and Sex Stereotyping and Scapegoating
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.23.20
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), on October 21, 2020, issued a Request for Information (RFI) seeking comments, information and materials relating to workplace trainings that involve race or sex stereotyping. Submissions are due by December 1, 2020.
The RFI was issued in conjunction with President Trump’s September 22, 2020 release of Executive Order 13950, titled Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping, which banned the use by federal contractors or subcontractors of training materials that “inculcate[ ] in its employees any form of race or sex stereotyping,” which is defined as “ascribing character traits, values, moral and ethical codes, privileges, status, or beliefs to a race or sex, or to an individual because of his or her race or sex.” The OFCCP previously issued guidance on that Executive Order. The RFI encourages stakeholders to submit comments, information, and materials, including – in particular – training materials, that would allow the OFCCP to provide “compliance assistance” to the contracting community. The RFI notes that materials may be submitted anonymously, but that any information submitted in response to this RFI may be subject to public disclosure. The RFI assures contractors that the OFCCP will not take enforcement action against contractors that voluntarily submit materials for review, “provided that such contractor or subcontractor promptly comes into compliance with the Executive Orders as directed by OFCCP.”
In a related development, Craig Leen, the Director of the OFCCP, explained earlier this week – in public comments – that “white privilege training and white fragility training” are “problematic.” Director Leen explained that the Agency views such training as problematic because they “draw[] general conclusions based on race and apply[] them to specific employees based on race.”
Contractors should consult with counsel if they are considering submitting exemplar training materials or other information for consideration and review by the OFCCP.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development
