1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |OFCCP Issues Request For Information on EO Prohibiting Race and Sex Stereotyping and Scapegoating

OFCCP Issues Request For Information on EO Prohibiting Race and Sex Stereotyping and Scapegoating

Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.23.20

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), on October 21, 2020, issued a Request for Information (RFI) seeking comments, information and materials relating to workplace trainings that involve race or sex stereotyping. Submissions are due by December 1, 2020.

The RFI was issued in conjunction with President Trump’s September 22, 2020 release of Executive Order 13950, titled Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping, which banned the use by federal contractors or subcontractors of training materials that “inculcate[ ] in its employees any form of race or sex stereotyping,” which is defined as “ascribing character traits, values, moral and ethical codes, privileges, status, or beliefs to a race or sex, or to an individual because of his or her race or sex.” The OFCCP previously issued guidance on that Executive Order. The RFI encourages stakeholders to submit comments, information, and materials, including – in particular – training materials, that would allow the OFCCP to provide “compliance assistance” to the contracting community. The RFI notes that materials may be submitted anonymously, but that any information submitted in response to this RFI may be subject to public disclosure. The RFI assures contractors that the OFCCP will not take enforcement action against contractors that voluntarily submit materials for review, “provided that such contractor or subcontractor promptly comes into compliance with the Executive Orders as directed by OFCCP.”

In a related development, Craig Leen, the Director of the OFCCP, explained earlier this week – in public comments – that “white privilege training and white fragility training” are “problematic.” Director Leen explained that the Agency views such training as problematic because they “draw[] general conclusions based on race and apply[] them to specific employees based on race.”

Contractors should consult with counsel if they are considering submitting exemplar training materials or other information for consideration and review by the OFCCP.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....